<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Total Buzz</title>
	<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com</link>
	<description>The insiders' hotline to Orange County government and politics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language></language>
			<item>
		<title>American Independent Party helps spur procedural change</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/american-independent-party-helps-spur-procedural-change/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/american-independent-party-helps-spur-procedural-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MARTIN WISCKOL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elections '08]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elections office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/american-independent-party-helps-spur-procedural-change/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve long suspected a coincidence of language was responsible for the American Independent Party being the largest third party in the state. Now there&#8217;s some evidence to back it up, and a change in the voter registration form that might put a dent in the party&#8217;s growth.
I come across a lot more discussion regarding Greens and Libertarians, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/debra-bowen.jpg"><img align="left" src="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/debra-bowen.jpg" alt="debra-bowen.jpg" /></a>I&#8217;ve long suspected a coincidence of language was responsible for the <a href="http://www.selfgovernment.us/aip/">American Independent Party</a> being the largest third party in the state. Now there&#8217;s some evidence to back it up, and a change in the voter registration form that might put a dent in the party&#8217;s growth.</p>
<p>I come across a lot more discussion regarding Greens and Libertarians, but the AIP in California has four times as many <a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ror/15day_stwddirprim_08/county.pdf">registered voters </a>as the Libertarians and more than twice that of the Greens. Based on that - and the fact that I&#8217;ve run into a couple accidental AIP members - I figured a lot of AIP registrants actually meant to register as decline-to-state or independent voters, not members of the &#8220;pro-life, pro-liberty&#8221; AIP. </p>
<p> <a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/american-independent-party-helps-spur-procedural-change/#more-4453" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/american-independent-party-helps-spur-procedural-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Candidates should be allowed to speak in church</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/poll-candidates-should-be-allowed-to-speak-in-church/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/poll-candidates-should-be-allowed-to-speak-in-church/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MARTIN WISCKOL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Candidates' OC visits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OC Political Pulse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/poll-candidates-should-be-allowed-to-speak-in-church/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News on Monday that John McCain and Barack Obama would be speaking at Saddleback Church in Lake Forest attracted plenty of comments, questioning if that didn&#8217;t violate the separation of church and state. I&#8217;ll get into why it doesn&#8217;t, officially, but first let&#8217;s look at the latest OC Political Pulse poll, where none of the 10 demographic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/sections/news/presidentialelection/ocpoliticalpulse/"><img align="left" src="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/ocpoltical-pulse-logo2.gif" alt="ocpoltical-pulse-logo2.gif" /></a>News on Monday that <strong>John McCain</strong> and <strong>Barack Obama</strong> would be <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/news/politics/article_2099810.php">speaking at Saddleback Church</a> in Lake Forest attracted plenty of comments, questioning if that didn&#8217;t violate the separation of church and state. I&#8217;ll get into why it doesn&#8217;t, officially, but first let&#8217;s look at the latest <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/sections/news/presidentialelection/ocpoliticalpulse/">OC Political Pulse poll</a>, where none of the 10 demographic groups said candidates should be banned from speaking at houses of worship.</p>
<p>Those who felt most strongly that they should be allowed to speak were conservative Christians (92%) and progressive Christians (81%). Democrats were among the most torn over the question, with 53% saying they should be allowed to speak. As for Republicans, 77% said they should be allowed to speak.</p>
<p> <a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/poll-candidates-should-be-allowed-to-speak-in-church/#more-4450" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/poll-candidates-should-be-allowed-to-speak-in-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hutchens issues draft concealed weapons policy</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-issues-draft-concealed-weapons-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-issues-draft-concealed-weapons-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PEGGY LOWE</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Sheriff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-issues-draft-concealed-weapons-policy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Sheriff Sandra Hutchens revealed her new comand staff today, she told reporters about a policy she has drafted on concealed weapons permits.
Responding to criticisms of former Sheriff Mike Carona&#8217;s policy as rewarding his political cronies, Hutchens said she will bar the issuing of any CCWs as a political or social favor. Anyone seeking to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/permit.jpg"><img align="right" src="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/permit.thumbnail.jpg" alt="permit.jpg" /></a>Before Sheriff <strong>Sandra Hutchens</strong> revealed her new comand staff today, she told reporters about a policy she has drafted on concealed weapons permits.</p>
<p>Responding to criticisms of former Sheriff <strong>Mike Carona&#8217;s</strong> policy as rewarding his political cronies, Hutchens said she will bar the issuing of any CCWs as a political or social favor. Anyone seeking to get a permit must demonstrate &#8220;credible, significant and substantiated&#8221; threats to their safety, she said, and they will be subjected to a background check. Anyone with a felony conviction, a misdemeanor charge involving violence or a misdemeanor charge in the last five years will be barred from the permits, Hutchens said.</p>
<p>Hutchens said her aim is to be &#8220;consistent, equitable and fair.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read the draft plan <a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/draftccw.pdf">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-issues-draft-concealed-weapons-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hutchens names command staff, mix of old and new</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-names-command-staff-mix-of-old-and-new/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-names-command-staff-mix-of-old-and-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PEGGY LOWE</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Sheriff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-names-command-staff-mix-of-old-and-new/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flanked by two former Los Angeles law enforcement veterans, Sheriff Sandra Hutchens today announced her command staff, comprised of four assistant sheriffs and a former colleague from the LA Sheriff&#8217;s Department as the undersheriff.
Answering one of the supes favorite questions during public interviews for the sheriff&#8217;s job, Hutchens kept Jack Anderson on as one of her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/sandrahutchens.png"><img align="left" src="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/sandrahutchens.png" alt="sandrahutchens.png" /></a>Flanked by two former Los Angeles law enforcement veterans, Sheriff <strong>Sandra Hutchens</strong> today announced her command staff, comprised of four assistant sheriffs and a former colleague from the LA Sheriff&#8217;s Department as the undersheriff.</p>
<p>Answering one of the supes favorite questions during public interviews for the sheriff&#8217;s job, Hutchens kept <strong>Jack Anderson</strong> on as one of her assistant sheriffs. The man who was handpicked by former Sheriff <strong>Mike Carona</strong> to serve as interim sheriff will now be heading a new administrative division.</p>
<p>In as undersheriff is <strong>John Scott</strong>, who was with the LA County Sheriff&#8217;s Department for 36 years and has been a consultant for Hutchens since she was appointed. In a surprise, Hutchens also hired <strong>Mike Hillmann</strong>, a respected former LA Police Department veteran, as an assistant sheriff. He will be in charge of operations.</p>
<p><em>9:15 p.m. update</em>: Read my online story <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/sheriff-hutchens-department-2103091-assistant-anderson">here</a>.</p>
<p> <a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-names-command-staff-mix-of-old-and-new/#more-4447" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/hutchens-names-command-staff-mix-of-old-and-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gilliard to run Hutchens&#8217; campaign</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/gilliard-to-run-hutchens-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/gilliard-to-run-hutchens-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PEGGY LOWE</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Sheriff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/gilliard-to-run-hutchens-campaign/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems Sheriff Sandra Hutchens has been very busy with the political and the professional these days&#8230;
Red County&#8217;s Matt Cunningham reports today that Hutchens has hired Dave Gilliard as her campaign manager. And, of course, she&#8217;s set to announce her command staff later today. (Your faithful blogger will have that report for you, dear readers.)
Gilliard seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems Sheriff <strong>Sandra Hutchens</strong> has been very busy with the political and the professional these days&#8230;</p>
<p>Red County&#8217;s <strong>Matt Cunningham</strong> <a href="http://www.redcounty.com/orange-county/2008/07/dave-gilliard-to-run-hutchens/">reports today</a> that Hutchens has hired <strong>Dave Gilliard</strong> as her campaign manager. And, of course, she&#8217;s set to announce her command staff later today. (Your faithful blogger will have that report for you, dear readers.)</p>
<p>Gilliard seems a smart choice on Hutchen&#8217;s part. He&#8217;s doing well &#8212; <a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/06/09/gilliards-wins-trans-loses-record-low-turnout/">as Martin reported</a>, Gilliard was 4-0 in OC races earlier this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/gilliard-to-run-hutchens-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top of presidential news</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/top-of-presidential-news-6/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/top-of-presidential-news-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DENA BUNIS, Washington Bureau Chief</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OC Political Pulse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Presidential election]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Today's top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/top-of-presidential-news-6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE MORNING LINE
Republicans rule in OC&#8217;s presidential money sweepstakes, according to the Register&#8217;s latest Follow the Money campaign database update.
Pulse Poll: Should political candidates be allowed to speak at churches and other houses of worship?
Barack Obama visits Israel&#8217;s Holocaust memorial; meets with Palestinian and Israeli leaders.
Obama is up 4.5 points in RealClear Politics poll of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/obamaisrael.jpg"></a><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/followmoney.jpg"></a><strong><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/followmoney.jpg"></a>THE MORNING LINE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/followmoney.jpg"><img align="left" src="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/followmoney.jpg" alt="followmoney.jpg" /></a>Republicans <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/news/presidentialelection/article_2101612.php">rule</a> in OC&#8217;s presidential money sweepstakes, according to the Register&#8217;s latest <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/news/presidentialelection/article_2101612.php">Follow the Money </a>campaign database update.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ocregister.com/section/oc-political-pulse-1957238/">Pulse Poll</a>: Should political candidates be allowed to speak at churches and other houses of worship?</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/obamaisrael.jpg"><img align="right" src="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/obamaisrael.thumbnail.jpg" alt="obamaisrael.jpg" /></a>Barack Obama </strong>visits Israel&#8217;s Holocaust memorial; meets with Palestinian and Israeli leaders.</p>
<p><strong>Obama </strong>is up 4.5 points in <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/sections/news/presidentialelection/">RealClear Politics </a>poll of polls.</p>
<p><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/obamaisrael.jpg"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/top-of-presidential-news-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Without a State Budget: Day 23 (The pain of the drill)</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/without-a-state-budget-day-23-the-pain-of-the-drill/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/without-a-state-budget-day-23-the-pain-of-the-drill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BRIAN JOSEPH, Sacramento Bureau Chief</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[State budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/without-a-state-budget-day-23-the-pain-of-the-drill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sacramento Bee yesterday quoted Senate Leader Don Perata as saying &#8220;There will be a budget on the floor next week,&#8221; meaning at least his house will vote on the budget next week. (Still can&#8217;t find the story online.)
I&#8217;ve since learned that the vote could be July 29, a Tuesday. But don&#8217;t get your hopes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sacramento Bee yesterday quoted Senate Leader Don Perata as saying &#8220;There will be a budget on the floor next week,&#8221; meaning at least his house will vote on the budget next week. (Still can&#8217;t find the story online.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve since learned that the vote could be July 29, a Tuesday. But don&#8217;t get your hopes up. There doesn&#8217;t appear to be a resolution on the horizon. It appears the vote is just a drill.</p>
<p> <a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/without-a-state-budget-day-23-the-pain-of-the-drill/#more-4442" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/23/without-a-state-budget-day-23-the-pain-of-the-drill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How your pet could get tagged under AB 1634</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/how-your-pet-could-get-tagged-under-ab-1634/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/how-your-pet-could-get-tagged-under-ab-1634/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BRIAN JOSEPH, Sacramento Bureau Chief</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[California Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/how-your-pet-could-get-tagged-under-ab-1634/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several readers have called or written me about my recent story on Assembly Bill 1634, asking how, exactly, dogs and cats would be citied. Here&#8217;s some clarification.
Animal control officers, upon their own discretion, can fine owners of intact animals when investigating non-noise complaints. Animal control can also fine owners of intact animals that end up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several readers have called or written me about my recent <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/bill-owners-pets-2099567-pet-animal?slideshow=1">story </a>on Assembly Bill 1634, asking how, exactly, dogs and cats would be citied. Here&#8217;s some clarification.</p>
<p>Animal control officers, upon their own discretion, can fine owners of intact animals when investigating non-noise complaints. Animal control can also fine owners of intact animals that end up impounded in shelters (i.e. for running loose).</p>
<p>Animal control cannot impound pets at your home for the sole reason of being intact.</p>
<p>Think of it like driving. If a police officer pulls you over for speeding and finds that you&#8217;re also not wearing a seat belt, you can get a ticket for that, too.</p>
<p>Pet owners can waive their fine once they have sterilized their animals. But sterilization becomes mandatory upon the third citation for dogs and the second for cats.</p>
<p>So for dogs, the first citation is $50 or sterilization; the second citation, $100 or sterilization; the third citation, mandatory sterilization.</p>
<p>For cats, it&#8217;s a $50 fine for the first citation or sterilization; for the second, its mandatory sterilization.</p>
<p>For more info, here&#8217;s a link to the bill <a href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1601-1650/ab_1634_bill_20080701_amended_sen_v90.html">itself</a>. And here&#8217;s a recent <a href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1601-1650/ab_1634_cfa_20080619_142451_sen_comm.html">analysis</a> of the bill, which is written in easy-to-understand language.</p>
<p><em>-Kelly Chen</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/how-your-pet-could-get-tagged-under-ab-1634/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP in the money in OC</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/gop-in-the-money-in-oc/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/gop-in-the-money-in-oc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DENA BUNIS, Washington Bureau Chief</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Presidential election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/gop-in-the-money-in-oc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama may be the king of presidential funding nationwide but in the OC, Republican giving to John McCain still reigns supreme.
Read about our latest analysis and check out Follow the Money, our updated campaign finance data base.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/followmoney.jpg"><img align="left" src="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/07/followmoney.jpg" alt="followmoney.jpg" /></a><strong>Barack Obama</strong> may be the king of presidential funding nationwide but in the OC, Republican giving to <strong>John McCain</strong> still reigns supreme.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/news/presidentialelection/article_2101612.php">Read </a>about our latest analysis and <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/sections/news/presidentialelection/">check out </a>Follow the Money, our updated campaign finance data base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/gop-in-the-money-in-oc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Nobama&#8217; video from Newport Beach</title>
		<link>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/nobama-video-from-newport-beach/</link>
		<comments>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/nobama-video-from-newport-beach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MARTIN WISCKOL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/nobama-video-from-newport-beach/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve invited you to submit political videos &#8212; advocacy, satire, commentary, what have you. As long as it comes from OC and isn&#8217;t obscene, we&#8217;ll post it. Newport Beach&#8217;s Steve Gooden, who&#8217;s proud to be an African American Republican, has taken us up on the offer with three videos. The first is below, and features the controversial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/06/12/oc-political-videos-wanted/">We&#8217;ve invited you </a>to submit political videos &#8212; advocacy, satire, commentary, what have you. As long as it comes from OC and isn&#8217;t obscene, we&#8217;ll post it. Newport Beach&#8217;s <strong>Steve Gooden</strong>, who&#8217;s proud to be an African American Republican, has taken us up on the offer with three videos. The first is below, and features the controversial New Yorker cover of the Obamas in the White House.</p>
<p>Think you can do better? Download it to YouTube and send me the link.</p>
<p><code>
<object	type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
			data="http://www.youtube.com/v/ykJxIeBO0u0"
			width="425"
			height="350">
	<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ykJxIeBO0u0" />
	<param name=wmode" value="transparent" />
</object></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/nobama-video-from-newport-beach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
